Edengrad reviews

Translated by
Microsoft from Deutsch
Early Access Review A few Days Ago, Edengrad caught my eye in the Steam Sale. For about 9 Euros there was this Early Access title to shoot. So just slammed without the great I would have noticed from the Title beforehand. Shortly after I was in the Game, I had already had enough. Kind Of weird the Thing. But then still tried a bit around and in the End I stuck. After about 14 Hours of Edengrad I have to say: Not so bad the Title. Quite and not bad. However, you have to overcome something in the Beginning here and there and give the Game a few Chances instead of just one. So you can almost forget all the Reviews of People under 1 Hour. Except you have the Expectation to find a fluid Running game immediately. It is just Alpha and it is just in the second And third week, respectively. You can see That clearly, too. However, the Game has some very good Side and it can be even ind He alpha quite a lot of Fun. Therefore, those who can stand something and are willing to act that you play a full-fledged alpha and not a full-fledged Gold game should have a lot of Fun. If you want to read a little more about it, you can follow this Link: http://weltennet.de/hydrogen/mmo-blick/242-edengrad-liebe-auf-den-dritten-blick
Translated by
Microsoft from Deutsch
Early Access Review Hello Love Steam Community, unfortunately, as with many other Games, I see very simplistic negative Reviews. I don't know if these People don't realize that the Game isn't even in the "Early Access" for a Week. It is the very first freely accessible Phase of the Game. Of course, the Developers are happy that this EA is already adding some Money. If you just look at how many Patch Notes there have been, you realize that the Developers are constantly improving the Game. So Why make a Game bad at this Point with good Approaches and noticeable Differences from other Suvival Games? I see no Reason to do so. Many didn't understand EA's Point. I knew what I was getting into: There are a lot of Bugs, server Reboots, Crashes. 9.74 for an unfinished Game? Yes sure, why not, which game is ready these Days? You spend 40-60 Euros on unfinished Games just because they are already in Store. So finally I would like to say: The Game excites me and I am very excited to see how it goes and how big the Whole thing will possibly become. In that sense. Thank you for reading and if you feel like It, take a look: https://www.youtube.com/edit?o=U&video_id=WyQC7FQoIl4 and get your own picture. LG your Jipsen aka NicisBoxEyes. Dear Steam Community, Unfortunately I see, as with many other games also, very simple negative reviews. I do not know if these people do not realize that the game is not even a week in "early access." It is the very first freely accessible phase of the game. Of course the developers are pleased that this EA is already adding some money. Anyone who simply looks at how many patch notes already has, notes that the developers are constantly improving the game. So why make a game bad at this time with good Approaches and noticeable Differences to other Suvival Games? I see no reason for this. Many have not understood the meaning of EA. I knew What I was going to have: There are many bugs, server reboots, crashes. £9.74for an unfinished game? Sure, why not, which game is finished nowadays? You pay 40-60 euros for ungames finished just because they are already in the shop. So, finally, I would like to say: The game excites me and I am very curious, how it goes on and how big the whole will eventually become. In the sense. Thanks for reading and if you feel like, have a look: https://www.youtube.com/edit?o=U&video_id=WyQC7FQoIl4 and make your own picture. LG your jips aka NicisBoxEyes.
Read more...