March of the Eagles reviews

The Game itself is more of something for those who always felt prevented from Doing things like DIPLOMACY and FINANCIAL/. It is an EU4 to fight for, that should be clear to anyone who wants to buy this Game. If you want to spread more through Alliances or a superior Economic Power, you should rather look for other paradox titles. But anyone Who, like me, is a Fan of Napoleonic Times and wanted more diversity of unity at EU4 is just right here. I was also slow to get excited about the Game but found it to be liked in the End. But you'd still rather wait for a Sale. 20 Euros is quite a lot for a pure War Simulation

The Game can do quite a bit for a Military Simulation. So Those who like to think strategically and tactically and like to fight Battles with 100,000 Men should buy the Game. The many different Tactics and Leaders give the Game a Strategic Depth that many other Titles do not achieve. However, anyone Looking forward to a Build-up platform Diplomatie/combat title in the Style of Crusader KIngs 2 or Europa Universalis Will be deceived. Apart from Fighting and Conquering, the Game offers little. There could have been more in the Diplomatic Sphere in particular. Despite Everything: For 5-10 Euros, Strategy Fans should strike. Find 20 Euros on Steam is a bit too much. Prese because the Game is not so motieve after playing through 1 times. Since it is always the same.

You have to think of this Game in a sch like a clearly slimmed-down Europe universailis. The Economy of a Country must be taken for granted, because it can hardly be expanded. The Game principle is very straightforward. Diplomatic Influence is Also very limited. The Main Focus is on the Military. Especially as An entry Into these Types of Games, it is suitable to try out such Game Concepts. You can't influence the Battle after you start it. The large Deficiencies in the Battles are described relaiv simply: The Generals have extremely large Implications for the Rise of a Battle. You can lose with 100000 men against 20000 Men, if you don't have a General yourself and the Opponent a very good one for it. Every Nation has the right historical Generals. You can't recrudge new ones. So Greece (Once it was founded) has 3 Pieces, all of which are bad and for that France has felt 50. This means that a Nation that has been made great will nevertheless always be at a Disadvantage to Nations with many good Generals. The Game is also partially misleashed. 90% of the Games end up in such a way that there is a constantly spreading blue "Blob" (France). Only Russia is similarly strong, with the AI with Russia despite (almost) unlimited Troop reserves not closing anything to the Pan except to defeat the Ottomans every 3 Years. The Game is not ghastly bad, but it is not good and it is not worth the Price either.