Once Bitten, Twice Dead! reviews

Early Access Review The Game may not be finished and must therefore also have its Quirks, such as too little Loot, Opponents and Places to Explore. Yet I don't see that this Game could ever get really interesting. That being said, the Need for Computing Power for a Game with such rudimentary Graphics is far too high.

The graphic doesn't bother me now, mainly it makes fun. The playing lessons do not come from the fact that I had fun playing, but because I had to wait as long to get my cards. So the game doesn't really fun because there's as good as nix. So far I can't recommend it, but with a giant update something could get out of it and maybe then there is a long high.

Good story mode is completely useless to shit, but the arena mode has potential. This sees that the game has been coded by people indie in lack of knowledge about programming (and a pretty huge lazy). It would have to put everything on the arena mode (which is a deathmatch in unlimited time), and by setting a few bugs and with more people on the servers there would be way to get something out of it. But hey, the game remains without great interest since it is an n-th survival/combat game that is heavily pulled from unterned. I even wonder how it could end up on sale on steam XP.

Early access review take the graphical paw of unturned, and remove everything that makes him a good game. You will get once bitten, twice dead! A map that comes from the asset of unity and that has not even been modified, zombies as rare and few varied as the items, animations to make you puke, sounds not sticking at all with their object/source, buildings (open) in which the character is not able to enter without valid reason, a disgusting interface being anything but ergonomic and practical, graphical and technical bugs as can be seen in all these low-end games: grass crossing the sidewalks and other surfaces badly managed hitboxes... The worst part of it? I picked up all these bugs in 7 minutes of play (minus two minutes, which I had to pass in the main menu and in the settings). We will also go on to the fact that the developers have bought positive recommendations on their game (strangely, the only people giving a positive review to "once bitten, twice dead!" are players with only one or two games on their account, with a recommendation stinting the advertising script.. wonder no?) The only quality of this game? Its existence, which allows to show how much the games accepted in early access must be better controlled and regulated, so as not to fall on abuses like this.