Blitzkrieg 2 Anthology reviews

I am greatly annoyed by this Game, time and again the Wayfinding has Problems, and Tanks drive directly into the Infantry when they are told to attack, in some cases it is also historically incorrect for the Romanians to use tanks IV F2 as early as 1942, which they use If the Germans still have partial air Superiority in the Soviet Campaign In 1945, or if in the Mission "Dodge," in the Soviet Campaign in 1945 the Allied air strikes do not begin until one has taken the first City, The first City on your own Troops, purposeful! Or that suddenly an enemy tank appears from behind and the reinforcement that has only just been got is destroyed. Without such Things it would be recommended, but so not with God.

I Don't approve of this game. (The game in general is fine. It Doesn't beat the first part, but it's a good game. Where's the problem? Well, the first IA, is like not... Nefarious, units that spin without knowing what to do, routing problems, things that will go. The first one was already crappy at IA, but at least it was balanced with the units. The tanks were very useful and nothing felt that it did not give the Taya. The worst is the logical lousy of the units. For example the tanks, rather useless in the game, because they prefer to shoot the infantry than to a tank or an anti-tank cannon. With which your tank is going to be taken by ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ And to top it a 50mm cannon can you petar ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ calmly to a King tiger if yes, logic and maximum realism. Artillery in 80% of cases gives you victory. If in the mission you have it available, if not, you are fucked in most missions. Very unbalanced. The exaggerated difficulty in many missions, especially in the fall of the Reich expansion. There have been four villages. Doing many missions practically impossible to pass unless you ring the key and have the luck of the rabbit. In General The game has interesting things like a dynamic campaign, improvement of units and, commanders, but fails miserably in an imbalance of units and a difficulty to test of Chinese. I Would recommend It if you are able to deal with those mistakes. If not, you better not touch it or you're going to fustrar. The graphics, well is a game of 2005. If that obviously is not a portent, nor was it in his day. Although that is, it's colorful. (The tanks do not see them move the chain da Caguela today but good. In General, if you don't mind a tremendously unbalanced game in your units, and with an exaggerated artificial difficulty, this is your game.