Runewards: Strategy Card Game reviews

Ambiguous game, let's deal with it. PvE Has A free story campaign, unlike all beloved HearthStone. For passing levels give permanent bonuses-print hidden properties of the starting cards. On The one hand you are interesting to pass the Pve for useful awards, with the other developers Tupho took what was originally to be issued... This is a creative but insolent deception. The Counterfixes are interesting and teach many strategic tricks. No driving by the handle. That'S just for access to late skirmishes need to pay coins that can be spent on boosters. In addition to the main story there are still daily randomly generated calls, absolutely free. This is a great way to collect crafting currency, experience and even cards. In General, single modes were excellent. The Variety of His Netushki, Sovem. The game has only three races (humans, monsters and demons), well, and neutrals, called mercenaries. Among themselves they are no different. All creatures have similar abilities, are drawn in the same style and are equal in strength. There are very few Maps, so little I have not met in any CI. There is no Tactical sample, usually you are stuffing the deck with the most powerful specimens, occasionally adding weaker but tricky ligaments. These Ligaments are not advantageous, because they make a lot of risk, and in the case of the use of one harmful spell the enemy can do everything. Replay After 6 hours tired, despite the fact that I love KI and there is a very good quality of performance. Unfortunately, nothing fundamentally new has not seen. The Game was made clearly in a hurry and with a great look at Gwent. As A result, there were few maps, few modes and zero perspective. Rusty here is banal nowhere, the same "Fable: Fortune" is several times wider, and she threw up for exactly the same reasons. Well, it is very fast: the battles cease to bring pleasure and boil down to the same schemes. You can see by the number of reviews on Steam. Developers, stop copying other people's ideas-do something of your own!

I just have to say started this game on IOS. Ofcourse, I think like much who know the game, I said this is Gwent, just someone made it for IOS, whatever. Than I started play and eventhough it still had alot of the feeling of Gwent, but slightly I started to see differences what I liked. -The rows in this game make sence -The campaign is way way more fun than Gwent. But tbh gwent was the worst single campaign I've ever played in what kind of game.. I literaly almost alseep, just clicking and all was good, It's so crazy boring easy. -The music and scene are more lighter, though not less fierce. -When I saw the 3D modeling of the cards, there I was really like damn I think I was wrong. the modeling of the cards is nice done, you see the depth of the cards, makes the card more worth. This game is NOT Gwent, its like comparing FIFA en PES is the same genre still people prefer one above the other? Why? cause it's different in his own way. The same for this game. This game is abit more adventure and I hope the devs will invest in the story of Runewards, I even had some laughs here and there.. why I'm helping that drunk bastard farmer XD he doesnt have a deck or something of his own? Good game. the only thing I like from heartstone I like they kinda use it, and its the UI, buttons , look. very good. And thanks good it's not like that game, but there is RNG of course, if you dont like RNG and you're a math fan, this game aint for you, better play prisamata, NO rng there. But this is an adventure and it makes the game replayable with the RNG, like that you can have different outcomes, else its boring. Try it for free, you can get a good feeling about it. The only thing I really liked more in GWENT are the kegs, they kinda made that part alot more fun of the monkey smasing the Kegs. But far from that I feel much more like this game has me comeback everytime to have a good time, and now on steam its even nicer.. keep the nice work up. Id say 9/10. 1 point I leave for them to show what single campaign going to be, than it's 10/10