Sorcery! Part 4 reviews

Oh. This Game I dedicate my 100th review. I do not know, in my opinion this is the greatest plank and I find it difficult to imagine a more perfect game. The First part was good. It's a Warm-up. The Second part was a successful chic. The Third-took the unthinkable standard of delight and complexity. It's just an ideal. Did not know what will be in the fourth part, probably thought that they-razrabi (STEVE JACKSON) surrender. But they struck the heavens. It's not a leap above the head. It's a six-fold flip above Kailas or I don't know what the tops are. It is IDEAL. Previous reviews on the 3 part https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198039971270/recommended/445040/and the compilation of the 1st and 2nd-http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198039971270/recommended/411000/Know, because I at the beginning of zero played in this without Internets-in Fight Books. And This is a great time, friends, yard, you know. So am i. Say. That Sorcery is the best fight book or game I've ever played before. DO YOU EVEN UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS MEANS? Sorri, for the caps-but I can not hold back the emotion. Digital picture-visual drawing on the virtual screen is better than the best paper treasure in the face of the fight book or the push of the 00-S. The First game took me 4 hours. Just sat down-ran and passed. No interruption. And I don't like to sit in games for more than 4 hours. I think it's a waste of time. And not for one game 4 hours-and a few during the 4-th. The Second Part I passed for 12 hours. And It was three days in a row for four hours. The Third Part I played a long time and a little bit and it brought me a lot of fun and good and high. I took 16 hours. The Fourth Part I passed two days in a row. And It took me exactly as well-16 hours. I think the comments are superfluous. And let all social rules-go-on X * r. This is one of the best experiences, as well as the most valuable-which I have received over the last few years. Along with teaching lectures and self-development. The Game of course, I believe, should be formed according to the laws of the player's personality. If The game is formed with the individual personality of the player correctly and complies with the rules that live personality, thinking, consciousness of the player-then, then, then the game will like the given individual and is considered good. Therefore, all the discussion on this subject, game magazines and criticism of the public-do not stand and the eggs are left. No One said that some game is bad and there are standards of any quality. Someone is playing Animishchnuj, someone in the shooter, someone in the Dammaku, someone in the collection of speed, someone in the RPG Maker (literally genre). The Most important element here is to build the main character on the player's personality and the main game world by the player's personality. Witcher 3 and Sonic 2 among themselves are absolutely equal between them there is no level of difference-"better-worse"-and there are no differences in the gameplay too-they are impersonal. You need to Look at the players, because the players give them importance and quality and share differences. Any game is for anyone. Someone Chooses what corresponds to his life preferences. Real physical life. The Witcher 3 cannot be compared with the Sonnik and with Gulman and with Skyrim and with Gothic and Dom. It is possible to Compare consciousness of mentality of people-not games. No Bad games. Bad people, too. There are simple and complex people. And the difference of individuality of sight. Sorcery-This is a game that perfectly lay under my Imagination. P/S/Do you Agree to live together forever, in freedom, in high and joy? -Yes, Padre. -100 of 100 Forever and ever. Now you are a loyal Sorcery fanatic and a game. I Bless you in the name of Jesus Christ. Amen.