What's the point to rate RDR2 as «exceptional» before release? I mean, it's absolutely about any game which is not released. Don't we have so many examples of titles that were worse than original? We do.
Great screenshots and game-video? Checkout this video for Vampyr — demo compared to the released game.
Good example that proves — screenshots and game-video means almost nothing.
I know that most people love Horizon, but for me it's «extremely weak story + great graphics». I could hardly imagine someone who rating the game as «exceptional» only for graphics.
Maybe we need separate «Waiting Rating» at RAWG instead of awarding the games for nothing.
Great screenshots and game-video? Checkout this video for Vampyr — demo compared to the released game.
Good example that proves — screenshots and game-video means almost nothing.
I know that most people love Horizon, but for me it's «extremely weak story + great graphics». I could hardly imagine someone who rating the game as «exceptional» only for graphics.
Maybe we need separate «Waiting Rating» at RAWG instead of awarding the games for nothing.
1 comment
2